Tuesday 6 May 2014

Context of Practice - Year Evaluation

The CoP module has been useful because it has given me a basic understanding of the conceptual side behind graphics. The study tasks have helped to reinforce concepts such as semiotics and certain connotations and denotations behind an image or piece of graphics.

I have developed skills in being able to research something fully before deciding on an appropriate method of production. This really helped the practical side of CoP to work well, as I knew all of my content before I began thinking about production methods. It also meant that I researched into production methods before trying to create them. When I chose the ration book I fully studied it and tried to mimic key features and design decisions which I felt were important.

A certain strength in my work would be the thorough research and time that I put into getting the final outcome as accurate as I can. I am really proud with the physical outcome I have produced. The tasks set through out the year have helped me to get used to doing extra research if I don't understand anything this paid dividends in my essay and practical work. As I then fully understood everything before I began creating it.

One weakness in my work is the essay referencing. I wasn't able to get books out before the holiday nor was I able to get any out back home so I had to fully rely on the internet. This is a lesson I have definitely learnt now: get books out well in advance. I feel my essay would have been a lot stronger if I had more substantial sources backing up the different arguments.

Writing the essay helped to bring everything I had learnt together, however I really struggled to find the right kind of references. Next year I will fully read around the subject before writing the essay, this will help me not make the same mistakes as this year. Although the essay wasn't the best it could be I felt it gave me an interesting starting point for my practical publication project. The aim of my book was to show a range of propaganda with a bit of a description or talk about them and the posters aims. My research translated very nicely into content, although for this project I had to research more specifically into propaganda posters and the meaning behind them, but whilst doing this I thoroughly enjoyed it and found it interesting.

Friday 2 May 2014

Brief 2 - CoP - Publication: Evaluation

My essay compared the uses of photography and art as a way of documenting war and their value in doing so. One thing that really stood out to me whilst writing the essay was how Guernica painting really did make people aware of what had happened and changed their views. I found it interesting that a piece of art, which primarily reflects an individuals feelings or outlook about something could be taken as fact. This got me thinking about how propaganda was used to change or manipulate peoples views. The posters with a painting on have no fact or truth behind them yet they convinced and changed so many peoples views on the war. This was exactly what I wanted to focus my publication on.

I had already done quite a bit of research due to my essay being about the war, as well as doing some research out of self interest. I knew I wanted to combine image and quotes in a book. A ration book seemed like the most appropriate type of production as it fed into the whole theme of war as well as with the idea of limitation and control; The book limits and controls how much food you get and the propaganda poster control what information you know. Both the ration book and propaganda were used by the government to control the masses. This really makes the Format relevant to the Content.

The aim of my book was to show a range of propaganda with a bit of a description or talk about them and the posters aims. My research translated very nicely into content, although for this project I had to research more specifically into propaganda posters and the meaning behind them, but whilst doing this I thoroughly enjoyed it and found it interesting.

In the end I decided to organise the content into 3 sections; German, British and American. As these three countries did a wide range of propaganda from anti-Semitic to being proud of your country and not eating as much. Originally I wanted all three in the same book but once I had got hold of a ration book I didn't realise, and therefore, didn't take into consideration how small/few pages there are. I decided that if I kept with the idea of it all being one book then it would no longer fit in with the concept of a ration book. I decided I would make 3 books; one for each country. Each book would be 20 pages with a short intro which would be the same for each book. Then each book would have a bit about that countries propaganda at the time of WWII. I felt this was the right sort of size and I am glad I changed from making one book to making three.

Design Decisions

Whilst looking through a Ration book I noticed a few key design features (Intentional or not) which I wanted to replicate. I felt by doing this it would make it closer to the ration book and more genuine. Here is a link to some primary research (Including the ration book) which influenced my design decisions.

1. Small Margins: The books all had text close to the edge of the page.

2. Typewriter Font: The Ration book looked almost like it had been typed up on an old typewriter. The letters were sometimes askew which really made it look hand made even though they would have been mass produced.

3. Large Gutter: In the traditional ration books they were stapled straight through down the left hand side which would have meant a larger gutter would have had to off been there to allow for this. This was something I initially deigned but when it came to printing it was a nightmare so some pages now look like they have a larger gutter when actually they are all the same.

4. Stock Choice: I really wanted to avoid working on normal paper. The ration book had an orangy brown cover and light grey/yellow pages. I decided to get the front cover as close of a match as I could. However for the body copy/main pages I worked with two light shades of sugar paper. This allowed me to vary as in the book some of the pages are different colours. I wanted to work with slightly lighter colours because I was going to be printing images onto it and the white would print as the stock so I needed it to be as light as possible so the images were clear.

5. Binding Method: I decided I would bind it how the actual books were bound, by stapling it. Initially I wanted it stapled on the front cover left hand side, however because the gutters didn't work as well I had to staple it on the fold instead. This wasnt too big of an issue and perhaps works better because of the size of the book having it stapled on the fold means you can open it up a lot easier.

Overall I have really enjoyed this project and even though certain aspects have been challenging such as printing it has been a great learning curve. It has really upped my confidence with making a publication and I feel I have been enthusiastic towards the idea, concept and research as I have enjoyed learning the design aspect as well as the history.


Thursday 1 May 2014

Brief 2 - CoP - Publication: Book Example

Final Books


Below is a page by page example of the first book. Each book follows this structure but the images and text are appropriate for that country.


This page is the same in all the books. A basic introduction explaining why I've chosen to do this. and a definition of propaganda.


This page is about the propaganda in the specific country and a quote from someone about propaganda. The quote above is from Joseph Goebbels about propaganda.








All pages follow this layout with text on the left and image on the right.


Brief 2 - CoP - Publication: Final Images










Brief 2 - CoP - Publication: Misprints

I found in the process of printing I made quite a few mistakes. Some understandable and some a bit silly. Below are a few examples.


One common problem was it printing at an angle. Im not quite sure how it printed at this much of an angle though.



This happened more than it should; feeding it in the wrong way and printing on top of what I just printed.


Using the wrong stock... classic


and another slanted one.

Overall I can't really complain about the misprints as it taught me what to do and equally what not to do. Especially to keep my eye on it and be constantly alert, not drifting into a daze.

Brief 2 - CoP - Publication: Making the books

Sourcing the paper was pretty cheap as I could get one sheet of A2 sugar paper in the library for 5p. The cover sheets we 30p for an A3  so all together I spent about £1 with plenty left over. I went for two different tones with the sugar paper as when I had looked through the ration book it was done and the pages were slightly different tones. I cut it all down so that it was A4 and I could feed it manually through my printer. Quite often it wont print ascew or slightly off because of the lining.

First I was printing one side landscape and then cutting it then refeeding it and printing the other. However I soon discovered the right size was portrait sheet of A4. This saved so much time as I could skip the trimming part. Once the whole book was printed I lined up the top pages so that it wouldn't need trimming later I could just cut the bottom off.

I found that even though the pages were exactly the same size once folded the ones in the centre ones stuck out. After I finished the book and bound it I cut it down. The whole idea of having a large gutter and small outer margin like in the ration book went to pot as when it cut they all varied on size. However I am not too fussed as it has cut correctly and not cut the type.