Friday, 6 November 2015

Dissertation: Last Chapter



For my last chapter I want to compare two different brands in the toiletry market. I am thinking about comparing Dove and Nivea as they both have a similar target market range but their products are designed with different unique selling points and they have different marketing strategies. The chapter could compare the two and look at all the things that I have touched on in the other chapters in relation to the two brands. Below are some of the main areas I have/will write about in my dissertation. This final chapter will be a great way to tie in the message of my dissertation with the practical design element.

Market Research
- what are people's views of the brand? do they correspond with the brands identity?
- who buys the product 

Semiotics 
- is any signs, symbols or indexes used?
- linguistics - the way its worded and the words chosen in relation to the target market.

Local/Global
- What audience does it reach?
- what companies is the brand in?
- has the design changed for the needs of other countries?

Logical/Emotional connection
-How does each brand connect emotionally and logically with the consumer?
- 'illusion of reality' is there one?

What are the goals, needs, motives, desires, wants of the target market?
Aspirations?

What problem is that product offering to solve?
What does the brand say about the individual?

The History of each brand
- changes in design to fit with lifestyle?
- change in target market
- extending to a mens range

Brand personality

Brand positioning
- where are they in relation to each other?

Brand loyalty

Thursday, 29 October 2015

Primary Research: Editing the Questionnaire

First Questionnaire

1. Male / Female

2. Age Category
18-24   25-30   31-40   41-50   51-60   60+

3. Occupation

4. What car do you drive?

5. What are your main hobbies and interests?

6. Describe your personality in 3 words.

7. What comes to mind when I say soap?

8. Out of the following brands which are you most likely to buy?

9. What soap/body wash do you currently use?


After creating my first questionnaire I looked at it critically and picked up on a few flaws:


3. Firstly I feel it would be better to ask people to categorise their jobs so this will be easier to analyse.


5. Instead of asking for a list of hobbies I have changed the wording of the question so it asks for just one hobby. This will be easier to analyse and compare to other answers.


6.  After deciding not to ask the respondent to describe their personality I have written 5 statements which they can circle how strongly they agree or disagree with. This will give a better insight into their lives and who they are.


Second Questionnaire

This is the second attempt at the questionnaire. There are 5 statements which should help to determine personality, again going over the questionnaire critically I noticed more problems. I want to keep editing the questionnaire until it is right because it is could cause real problems later when it comes to look at the results.



Problems:

• After showing my questionnaire to Ness she made a valid point - people may feel unhappy or sad circling unskilled work especially if it is their career. I have decided to get rid of the categories and just ask for the occupation, I can categorise them later myself.

• There needs to be some form of instruction and introduction. Although I will be reading it to the majority of people, I will send some out so it does need to make sense to someone who has no idea about what it is.

• After reading doing your research project by Judith Bell, she made it clear that you should always write a bit thank-you at the end. I will incorporate this as well as highlighting the quick time it takes to complete the questionnaire as if people can see it'll be under a minute then they will be more likely to do it. I will also highlight the fact that the questionnaire is anonymous unless they want to leave their contact details.

• I will add a bit at the bottom asking if people would be interested in participating in further research.

• Questions 9 and 10 are too similar - they will produce a similar result as they both find out whether someone is logically driven or more emotionally driven.

• Question 8 - You prefer to be surrounded by a group of people over spending time with yourself.
I don't think this will get good answers because everyone needs time with people just as everyone needs time alone. The question will be changed to "I am happy in my own company" this is a better way of wording it but it still find out what i want to know.



 Third Questionnaire
This questionnaire has included all the changes that have been previously noted. There is now an introduction at the beginning of the questionnaire so that it gives the questionnaire context and makes the questions seem less random together. In bold I have highlighted the fact the questionnaire will only take a minute to complete and that it is anonymous. I have left room to write a number in the top - this is something I will do as I go as it will be easier than printing loads off with different numbers. I have changed the structure of the questionnaire so that all the personality questions are at the bottom. This fits in the page a lot better as the other questions can be put into two columns but the personality ones need a longer line for the scale. Questions 11, 12 and 13 have been changed and shortened to make sure that they are all different and will all find out different information. I have written a thank-you section at the bottom and added an extra bit asking if people want to be contacted for further research - I know the majority of people will say no but it will be beneficial to ask and see.

Question 8: Out of the following brands which are you most likely to buy?
This question needed to have a bit more substance behind it. By researching into the target markets and selling points of main brands I will be able to see what people want from a brand. I have picked a few from different price points as well as aiming at various target markets; the more difference between product choices will create a clearer distinction between different market segments that answer. 

I was concerned that men may not feel like they would pick any of them, in an effort to reduce this possibility I have added two especially for men: Lynx and Old Spice. The other ranges: Dove, Nivea, Molton Brown, L'Occtaine, and Imperial Leather all have their own mens range of body was as well. The following question in the survey will allow them to write which brand they currently use, so this question will just be useful so seeing their preferences and what products they are most attracted to.




Lynx

Targets 16-24 year old males who want to be the attraction of all women. "Elida Faberge began by sending the - predominantly female - Lynx marketing department clubbing in towns such as Leeds and Manchester, to give them a feel for their target market of 16 to 24-year-old men." A clear image comes to mind of a lynx user out in Leeds on a Saturday night. Lynx own 50% of their target market which shows how they have perfectly tapped into what the young men want and desire.
Dove
Dove actually targets 18-34 year old women which is surprising because traditionally their packaging design shouts out to older women. Women who are middle class and have a high income, although their target market may have a high income, this is not reflected by their reasonable, affordable prices. This fits in with their motto "beauty should be for everyone." their products and advertisements aim to educate girls and women and empower a healthy self perception and self esteem.


Imperial Leather
Imperial leather is positioned as the best luxury soap products. It is luxury for the everyday. The logo has retained a luxurious quality whilst the designs have been revived to represent a gentle explosion of fragrance and indulgence. Some argue that the brand has lost touch with younger generations due to an amorphous personality.



Nivea
18-34 year old women who have a middle to high income. They are self empowered and want to take good care of their skin for their own health as well as too look good and boost their self esteem. Whilst the target market are strong and independent they are also gentle, caring, and feminine this has been reflected in the packagings amiable effeminate design.
  

Molton Brown
Molton Brown targets the upper end who appreciate a higher quality product and an affluent accompanying brand image. They are known as London's bath, body and beauty connoisseurs and their products can now be found in 5 star hotels, stylish homes and high end department stores. People who buy this like to present a wealthy and upper class lifestyle. The design is refined and classic, their products use rare ingredients and have specialist ranges for both men and women.

L’Occitane
Isn't limited by age, 20 year olds will buy the same products as 65 year olds because what they are looking for in the product is the same. L'Occitane brings traditional fragrances and natural products to a middle and upper class market who are willing to pay more for a quality, traditional product.

Palmolive
Palmolive is a gentle, caring product and company whose long line of history and tradition makes them a trusted brand and product choice today.  







Old Spice 
Old Spice is no longer viewed as the product your dad uses. Its approach has updated the masculine image which comes with using Old Spice, making it more attractive for women to purchase on behalf of their man as well as it being a more appealing option for men. The advertisements use humour to appeal to their target market, not to forget the sex appeal of their actors presenting "the man your man could smell like". This product is bought by 'real men' who don't want to be related to fancy smells and delicate fragrances.



http://www.slideshare.net/maysiriwan/nivea-marketing-communication-analysis
https://naturalcosmeticslovers.wordpress.com/xxxxxxxxxxxxx/loccitane/consumer-analysis-of-loccitane/
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2000/nov/20/marketingandpr
http://www.slideshare.net/carrinekezia/dove-marketing-plan-37041827
http://www.slideshare.net/asherwilson/imperial-leather-business-proposal

Friday, 23 October 2015

Primary Research: Personality Theory and Questions

Personality directly affects a person's perception of the world; a person with an adventurous, enthusiastic, and compassionate personality will have a much more positive outlook on life compared to someone who is callous and obstinate. People's personalities influence their view of the world, personalities also influence what they search for in products/packaging design.  Supermarkets bombard us with a mass of information all from different packages claiming to be the best. Our brains can naturally filter out unnecessary information and our eyes are drawn to packages that 'speak to us'.  The packages that tend to speak to us are the ones that have a relatable or likeable personality for us.

Xander Becket writes about four personality types: competitive, spontaneous, humanistic, and methodical. People's different personalities means what they look for in a package will be different,
"Once you've identified their type, you can tweak your approach to the process to better suit their needs. Your potential clients are not all the same, so your strategy for communicating with them shouldn't be either." Xander argues that designer's must know the most effective way to design for the different personalities. 

Competitive Personality
People with competitive personalities are independent and highly driven, they like to be ahead of everyone else and want to be seen as a leader. They look for products which reflect their direct nature by clearly outlining the solution to their problem; they want to know that the product is going to maintain their top position.

Spontaneous Personality
People with spontaneous personalities don't care for competition; they love projects that they have a genuine interest in. They are creative and enthusiastic people who look at 'the bigger picture' rather than being weighed down with the details and intricacies. This means that they are more attracted to packaging that focuses on bold, eye-catching design rather than informational design. They look for products which give them a feeling of excitement; the product needs to be instantly interesting as they loose interest quickly.

Humanistic Personality
People with humanistic personalities are magnanimous; they consistently put the needs of others' ahead of their own. Their thoughtfulness means they search for products which make everyone happy. Testimonials are a great way of persuading them to purchase since they are people orientated they like to hear the success other have had after purchasing the product. 

Methodical Personality
People with methodical personalities love information as they naturally analyse facts and information before making an informed decision. Emotional drives don't have a strong hold over their decision process but rather rational drives, because of this they don't purchase on an impulse, instead they spend a lot of time considering their decision. They are the most inquisitive personality and will often as a lot of questions; they look for the facts and figures in the packaging design to affirm their judgement prior to purchasing.


Questionnaire
After critically analysing my original questionnaire design, I decided that asking people to state three of their personality types was too vague and hard to answer. If I was put on the spot and asked for three of my personality traits I would really struggle to list three and the three I picked probably wouldn't be that accurate! If people don't give accurate answers then it will skew the results and although their responses may point to aspirational personality traits it doesn't reflect them as a person. 

Instead I could give a few statements which they would then circle how strongly they agreed or disagreed with, this would give an insight into their personality and how they cope in certain situations. 

For example: Winning a debate is more important that making sure no-one gets upset.
Strongly Disagree  /  Disagree  / Somewhere in between  /  Agree  /  Strongly Agree

OR I could give two opposing options and they have to circle the one that they mainly relate to.

For example: You like organisation and structure OR You go with the flow (are laid back)

Changing the structure of how I ask about their personality will hopefully minimise wrong answers. If the questions are structured so there is no right or wrong answer then people will be more willing to answer honestly. I think using a scale will work better than a one or another option as the majority of people won't feel really strongly about everything and will sit somewhere between the two options. I don't want people to feel like neither of the options apply to them, by offering a scale it gives people the reassurance that they can sit in the middle. I don't want to have loads on the questionnaire as it needs to remain as short as possible, however I equally don't want to have so few that it doesn't produce good, useful results. To find the right balance and get the most out of these questions I need to carefully think what I am going to ask as I don't want the questions to be similar and repetitive. I also need to define what the answers would tell me in order to justify why they are being asked. 

Xander Beckets four personality types can be used to guide what sort of personality category respondents fall into. This is by no means a definitive personality guide, it only offers an insight into the consumer and what they may look for in products, personality is subjective and therefore difficult to measure. If I had more time, money, and experience I would like to explore this further and in more depth however the questionnaire is about producing a broad range of results, I can conduct interviews later on to get more in-depth research.

 You prefer going with the flow and being spontaneous over organising and structuring your day. 
Spontaneous personality 
This will be a big indicator into how they live day to day life; whether they prefer to plan everything and have a plan or if they prefer having a blank start and seeing where the day takes them. People who prefer structure I feel will need more convincing with a product, whilst still being swayed by emotion they will need to back it up with reasons and rationalisation i.e "its a good price" "it has healthy ingredients". Where as those who go with the flow will show a more spontaneous personality being drawn to packages with an initial wow factor, they will be much more willing to give products a try as they are driven by emotions.


Winning a debate is more important than making sure no-one gets upset.
Competitive personality
Humanistic personality
People with a competitive personality are direct and are more self focused; their interest is in self progression, they are sure in their views and are happy to stand up for what they believe even if others disagree. They like to see themselves as leaders and buy products to project this image to others, they like products that cut straight to the point and tell them the benefits; how they will remain on top. Humanistic personalities are more emotionally driven and as they care for those around them and believe that keeping harmony is more important than always being right. They are attracted to products with a level of honesty and only want the best, not for themselves, but for those around them.

You prefer to be surrounded by a group of people over spending time with yourself
Competitive personality
Humanistic personality
Both the competitive and humanistic personality enjoy spending time around others as they both have sociable natures. The competitive personality enjoys being in a social environment and receiving comments about their latest products, the compliments reinforce their brand loyalty. People who are happy in their own company tend to be less persuaded by what others are doing or buying; they are secure in themselves and use more rational logic when buying products.

Logic is more important than heart when making important decisions
Methodical personality
Humanistic personality 
Methodical personalities look for clearly outlined benefits, they don't want to hear the products the best - they want to know why its the best. They look for the reasons behind things and are ruled by logic over emotion. Humanistic personalities are swayed more emotionally and tend to decide what to do based on how they feel about it rather than the facts, their heart rules their brain.

You like to focus on the possibilities of the situation rather than the realities
Spontaneous personality
Methodical personality
Optimistic or Realistic
This question tries to gage the respondents outlook on life - whether they look at situations optimistically and try to see the best in everything or whether they look more realistically at things and consider the facts and figures, much like the methodical personality.

Wednesday, 14 October 2015

Primary Research: Questionnaire

The purpose of the questionnaire is to segment the population and form different markets that I can target, for this reason the questionnaire will be quantitative. Questions will be quick and simple to answer, this will make it a lot easier to get a larger quantity of results. I initially want to get as many responses as I can as this will give me more data to work from as well as making any correlations more credible and valid. For the research to be effective, then ideally a diverse range of respondents will answer the questionnaire, I am aware that I do not have the budget nor the resources that a marketing agency would have however I want to do everything I can to make sure the questionnaire targets a range of people. I will go out on the streets of Leeds and ask the public myself, this way I know a range of people have had an input. It also means I can verbally ask the questions and be on hand to clarify their meanings.

This research will kick the design ball rolling, I want to use the questionnaire for two reasons: firstly, to get a brief overview of the respondents lifestyle and personality. After reading for my dissertation it has been apparent that the lifestyle and personality of the shopper does affect what products they are attracted to and then purchase. Secondly, part of the research will be specifically about soap - since this will be the practical outcome relevant questions will provide me with an insight into what products people use and what associations they have. The research questions will focus on these two areas and hopefully when all the questions are viewed I can pick up on beneficial correlations such as men of xx age tend to use xx product and have xx personality traits. Although qualitative research would be most appropriate for better understanding personalities and lifestyles, this questionnaire will give me a much broader range of results. The results will provide a good starting place and will allow me to conduct further in-depth interviews later on where I can focus on a smaller number of people but go more in-depth in understanding their lifestyle and personality and how this affects what they buy.

The first three questions will provide demographic information about the respondent. Providing their gender, age and occupation will give context to the other answers.

1. Male / Female
This is a simple start of question to help put the respondent at ease.

2. Age Category
18-24   25-30   31-40   41-50   51-60   60+
I've decided to use age categories instead of asking for an exact number because I think people will be happier, especially women, to circle a category rather than write a number. The age starts at 18 because although I do want to design a soap package for children the questions in this survey would not be appropriate. Partly because they aren't the buyer, they are just the consumer and whilst the design has to appeal to them it also has to appeal to the parents. I will write separate questions aimed at children or may just use informal in-depth interviews which will be easier for children to answer and understand as it would be more of a conversation. I will also ask the child's parents what they look for in the product and what is important to them so that the design can both take into account the mothers and child's needs.

3. Occupation
After reading about questionnaire design in Data Collection by Wendy Oslen, I have steered away from asking about the respondents income - instead I will ask for their occupation. The book discusses sensitive questions that people might not feel as comfortable answering - income is definitely one of these. In a different setting such as an in-depth interview it may be more acceptable to ask but because I am stopping strangers on the street for 30 seconds then this question is not appropriate as it will make the respondent feel uneasy. By asking what occupation they have it not only makes it easier for them to answer but also provides an insight into their life.

4. What car do you drive?
An easy, closed-ended question. In Vance Packard's The Hidden Persuaders he writes about how people's choice of car says a lot about them. A car is a big purchase and it says a lot about you to the outside world, by asking what type of car the respondent drives it will be an indicator to what sort of lifestyle they lead. Obviously there will be exceptions to this where people either don't drive cars, or their choice wasn't emotionally driven however on the whole a car reflects the individuals income and personal image.

5. What are your main hobbies and interests?
What people do in their spare time and what their interests are will provide a broader picture of the individual. If they enjoy rock climbing and hiking then we can assume they are more outdoorsy people and will purchase products which support and reflect this lifestyle.

6. Describe your personality in 3 words.
Asking individuals to describe their personality will show qualities they think they possess. The answers may not be accurate as the way we view ourselves is often quite different to how we are viewed however asking the respondent how they perceive themselves is useful because it suggests the personality traits they aspire to. Seeing as people tend to buy products with relatable personalities then this question may reveal the personality that the packaging will have to present.

7. What comes to mind when I say soap?
The aim of this question is to find out what people associate with soap. I've left the question open so that respondents could reply with words or an image that comes to mind. This is an open ended question but it will not be a long answer so it won't be hard to view statistically. It will be interesting to see if people from the same segments say the same sort of words.

8. Out of the following brands which are you most likely to buy?
• List Brands - separate for men and women
The aim of this question is to see what brands the respondent feels best resonates with them. I will perhaps take along images of the products so that they have something visual to compare. The question will show what type of brands would be the soaps competition.

9. What soap/body wash do you currently use?
This question will show what the respondents use and give me a point of reference for comparing designs and brand ethos. It would be interesting if their is a correlation between people who use certain products and their personality or lifestyle.

Would you be interested in partaking in a further informal in-depth interview?
I expect the majority of people will say no to this, which is fine. However if a few people said yes then it would give me respondents to approach later when I've got a better idea of what else I need to know.

It is important to ask the questions in a logical order, I have decided to ask the demographic questions first, then explore personality and lifestyle, finally I will ask soap related questions. This order is the most appropriate because the questions become more specified in relation to the practical design. Demographic information is easy to answer so by putting this first it makes the questionnaire seem less daunting or challenging.

Wednesday, 30 September 2015

Primary Research: Plan

The first chapter of my dissertation will be on market research. I already had a basic understanding of different types of research but it was useful to revisit it in more depth as well as in the context of packaging design. It was clear pretty early on how important market research is when it comes to packaging design especially when it comes to designing for a set target market. It is important for me to undertake my own research before creating a practical outcome so that I can use the research as a base/starting point. I want to have everything ready to carry out the research as soon as possible so that it gives people longer to respond to the questions as well as hopefully getting more responses, it will also give me more time to carry out further in-depth research later on if appropriate.

I want to figure out what I want to know and what would be beneficial so that I get the most out of the research. There are two main reasons for researching, firstly it would be interesting to find out people's awareness of packaging design and its effectiveness. Secondly part of the research should be focused specifically on the outcome I want to produce, if I am going to design a package for soap then I need to ask questions that are relevant to it.

What do I want to find out?
• If people think their product choices are affected by the packaging design.
• What do people consider when buying a product? (cost, design, ingredients)
• Brand loyalty - are people loyal to certain brands even with so much choice, and if so then why?
• Do consumers have an emotional connection to the products they buy.
• Do they buy stuff for the way it makes them feel or perhaps because of the way the product looks?
• What do people associate to brands?

• What soap they use.
• Why they use that soap/ Why they chose it.
• What characteristics do you look for when choosing a soap?/ What affects your decision to pick it.
• First words/images that come to mind when I say soap.
• Range of different soap packages - ask them which one they would choose and why it appeals to them the most.

Types of Research

There are a few different types of research that I believe would be beneficial for me to carry out in order to get a range of research.

Questionnaires 
Questionnaires would be the best way at getting a large amount of responses. It will be especially useful in defining target markets and getting a general understanding of the publics perceptions towards brands. The questionnaire would mainly have a quantitative structure - closed ended questions means they are quick to do, meaning that people are more willing to do it as they are not put off by writing a long paragraphed answer. The questions have to be worded in a non-bias and easy to understand format; if they are complicated or set the respondent up to answer in a particular way then it will distort the research results.

The questionnaires would be sent out online on a device such as Survey Monkey, I am aware that using this alone would not produce a range of answers from different target markets since its main way of being distributed would be over social media such as Facebook. This means that although I may get a lot of responses, it would be from a similar group of people. The focus of my dissertation is on designing for different target markets, for this reason it is important for me to go out into the general public and ask them the same questions; this way I can approach a diverse range of people and get an equally diverse range of research. The questionnaire would be read out to the respondent and then I could write down their response, this would keep it moving quickly and wouldn't rely on them correctly interpreting the question as I would be able to explain. This structure of research would work best with questions that are quick and easy to answer so that people are more likely to stop and answer them, especially if it only takes 30 seconds.

In-depth Interviews
In-depth interviews would be useful before I begin designing as it would help to explain what people are attracted to within a design, what they think/ feel towards current designs as well as the associations they have made towards products/brands. One on one interviews would give the respondent control of the conversation and let them express how they feel without the influence of anyone else or time constraints. In-depth interviews could also be carried out after a few designs or mockups had been created, it would be a good point to get feedback and honest opinions from potential users. At the bottom of the quantitative questionnaire it could ask the respondent if they would be interested in taking part in further in-depth research or whether they mind being contacted. I would expect the majority of respondents to say no, but the few that say yes would be able to provide a deeper insight into packaging design especially if I could interview them before and after the practical side of CoP is designed.

Retail Environment
It is also important to visit the types of places the product would hypothetically be sold. Supermarkets will have a very different way of presenting the products compared to Boutique/Specialist shops. Supermarkets are presenting a range of different brands and products all competing and all promising to do the same thing, the design for the context of a supermarket would need to take this into consideration. However a specialist shop won't have this level of competition especially if it only sells one brand, this means that the design can be more subtle and imbue luxury. Environmental factors should be considered such as the lighting of the shop and shelf space, both of these will affect the design whether it is the shape or the material used.

Spending time in the products environment will allow me to see similar elements throughout the competing brands as well as recognising the differences - what stands out and why does it stand out? Does it make it better than its competitors or does it stand out because is it not an appropriate design? For the practical element I want to pick an every day essential that everyone uses, something like soap would allow me to design for a range of different people but ultimately the product would be the same. I want to visit and study a range of different environments from soap sold in the supermarket to more expensive places like Yorkshire Soap, this would allow me to compare the differences between how the products have been designed with the target market in mind as well as the context in which the soap will be sold.

I would also like to conduct some form of Ethnographic research. This would be extremely useful as it would show the person's decision making process and what they look at. It would be best if I could ask them after why they have picked what they have picked to provide some context. However I am not too sure how I can carry out this research without appearing creepy. It would have to be covert because if I asked someone to pick out a soap or explained what I was doing they would become extremely conscious of everything they were doing rather than acting naturally, this would provide incorrect results and may even skew the research.

Emailing Professionals
Another type of research which I feel would be beneficial is emailing professionals. I want to create a few concise questions which I could email to different packaging design studios, this would provide an insight into what designers think who already work in the industry and have experience.


Questionnaire Potential Questions

I would need to find out some basic information about the respondents so that it would give context to who thinks what. It would be hard to find correlations between answers if no demographic information is given. The kind of information I would need would be whether they are male or female, their age category and occupation - this would give an insight into salary. Below is a list of potential questions that could be used in the survey:

Do you buy supermarket own brands? Why?

Are you loyal to any brands, i.e only drinking coca-cola or only using heinz ketchup opposed to other brands?

What about the brand makes you loyal? / Why is it the best?

Do you think the design of a package affects people's perceptions of the brand?

Do you judge a product based on its design?

What supermarket do you shop at?

----

What soap do you use?

Why did you choose it?/ What attracted you to it?

What words/images come to mind when you think of soap?


(I will continue to revisit this and add more questions)

Dissertation: Plan

A design can be beautiful but if it is not aimed at a target market then it won't sell. My dissertation will be an explorative study into packaging design with the focus being on the target market. Packaging design's purpose is to sell a product, having an understanding of the target market gives you an understanding of who you are designing for.

Chapters: 1. Market Research
Market research seems like the obvious starting point. It will highlight the importance of conducting market research, the different types and the benefits it offers to packaging design.

2. Understanding the Influences and Motivations of the Target Market 
This chapter will explore the subconscious influences over the target market such as culture, emotional drives/reasons for buying, shopper personality and self image. 

3. The Retail Environment
Since 70% of purchases are decided in the shop it is important to consider the context the design will be seen in and any accompanying limitations.  

4. Design Elements
This will look at colour, type, image etc... all the design elements that make up the visual appearance of the packaging. It will look at the affects that different elements have on the audience and will explore how whats appropriate for one target market is not appropriate for another.

5. Evolution/ Revolution
This will look at the constant updating that is needed to maintain brand values and keep the design fresh and exciting. Evolution will cover the more established brands, showing how tweaks and minor changes can be enough to rejuvenate the packaging. Revolution will look at the packaging that no longer works and has gone under a complete make over to make it appropriate for the target market.

The Practical Supporting Design
For the practical element I want to take an everyday commodity that everyone would use regardless of age, gender or social class. The packaging would then be designed for the item but it would be designed four different times for four different target markets. Four different designs seems like a good number because it perfectly supports my dissertation by showing a range of distinctive outcomes for the same product. The aim of this would be to illustrate how packages are designed to attract a certain target market; even when the product is the same inside different people are attracted to different designs.

I am aware that I am limited in both resources and time. Designing packaging for a bar of soap means I would have access to materials such as card, compared to designing anything that would involve plastic as it is outside of my resources. Equally I don't want to set myself so much work that it becomes unachievable or isn't finished to a high quality. For those reasons I think it would be best to design four separate soap packages in reinforce the points that will be raised in the dissertation.

Tuesday, 29 September 2015

Dissertation: Examples to Use

Lucozade
Lucozade was originally called Glucozade and was invented to provide a source of energy for the sick. The original packaging design was a glass bottle with a yellow cellophane wrap and the slogan to accompany it was 'Lucozade aids recovery'. The product was rebranded in 1983 and the target market was shifted from the ill to the healthy and active. Lucozade changed its slogan to 'Lucozade replaces lost energy' and with this change became an energy drink aimed at the exercising population. 


The original adverts feature a young girl smiling up at her mother who is giving her a glass of lucozade. The advert includes a review from exclaiming how incredible Lucozade is and how her daughter has "improved more than words can express" The focus of the advert is fully promoting Lucozade as a medicinal drink; making its target audience the ill or those purchasing on behalf of the ill. 


The new design is stronger, fiercer and powerful. The bold capitalised type stands out making the message clear. The short one word sentences add to the punchiness of the message. The slick design of the curved in bottle makes it easier to hold, carry and drink from. The choice of plastic over glass for the products packaging reduces the bottles weight making it easier to carry on the go. This aided in the switch of target market by removing the preconception of a glass medical bottle 

They understood their new target market needed something they could drink whilst they were exercising. Exercising normally involves being out and active, the packaging design has taken this into consideration and consequently is equipped to suit the needs of the target market. The light weight material does not weigh down the consumer but instead makes it easy to carry whilst exercising. The flip up lid makes the Lucozade easily and quickly accessible, meaning the consumer doesn't need to stop to unscrew or rescrew the bottle lid. This easy to open and close top makes it ideal for drinking on the go.

A clear colour palette has been established for Lucozade to help cement the purpose of its product and its target market. The blue is associated with open spaces by both representing the sea and the sky. Yellow is an optimistic colour, it has an enthusiasm which implies an energetic energy. The freedom of the blue combined with the energy and positivity of the yellow perfectly communicates the purpose of the product to the new target market.



In the course of sport events Lucozade has sponsored applicable events this has helped to promote and clarify their target market by directly advertising to the market they are aimed at; people who play sports. If the target market is carefully considered for the product then adverts can be aimed directly at the people that will buy your product. Clarifying the target market not only allows you to directly advertise at the people who will buy your product but all allows you to design for them in mind.

After the rebranding, between 1984 and 1989 UK sales tripled to almost £75 million.


Bite the Wax Tadpole
Shows language not translating well between cultures.
Translating text and sounds can also pose a few problems. One urban legend involving Coca-Cola is a great example. When Coca-Cola started its expansion into China, they were looking for Chinese symbols that would sound exactly like their brand name. However, if you looked at the meaning of the signs, people could actually read “Bite the Wax Tadpole”.

However, Coca-Cola didn’t release these signs themselves. Local shopkeepers started looking for a way to promote Coca-Cola on their own accord and created several combinations of symbols that sounded similar to the brand’s name without considering their meaning. So Coca-Cola was in fact advertised as “Bite the Wax Tadpole”.

The signs representing Coca-Cola in China can be translated by “to permit mouth to be able to rejoice”, which is, of course, a lot more relevant to Coca-Cola.



Y Water
A perfect example of understanding the target market - Both parent and child/buyer consumer.
plastic-lined tetrahedron-shaped packages

Aimed at getting kids to drink healthier alternatives to fizzy drinks. Started by a dad who didn’t want his kids drinking lots of fizzy drinks. Its design has carefully considered the needs of both the buyer and the end consumer. Parents are concerned with the health aspects and how it will affect their child. Whilst the children enjoy the bright colours and unique shape. The bottle shape allows different bottles to be connected creating a fun game for the children and keeping their interest in the product. The bottles shape distinctly looks like a Y and plays on a common response asked by children “Why?” encouraging the inquisitive and explorative nature of children.

Coca-Cola Turner and Duckworth Redesign
Example of well established brands still being recognisable once reduced to their most basic qualities. Shows memorable and successful design as consumers (even those not in the target market) can recognise the brand without seeing it fully. 

Less is more
He has taken all the recognisable design elements of coke and reduced them to their most essential parts. It shows that people recognise and are familiar with the brand. It won the Pentawards 2012 (diamond award)

“Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing to remove, said St-ExupĂ©ry. Less is more, said Mies van der Rohe ... Nothing better than these two quotes to praise the Diamond Pentaward 2012.” (http://www.pentawards.org/winners/?p=11469)

Coca-Cola C2
Example of not using market research correctly and not making clear what the benefits were - it didn’t call out to a target market.

For its biggest launch since Diet Coke, Coca-Cola identified a new market: 20- to 40-year-old men who liked the taste of Coke (but not its calories and carbs) and liked the no-calorie aspect of Diet Coke (but not its taste or feminine image). C2, which had half the calories and carbs and all the taste of original Coke, was introduced in 2004 with a $50 million advertising campaign.

However, the budget couldn’t overcome the fact that C2’s benefits weren’t distinctive enough. Men rejected the hybrid drink; they wanted full flavor with no calories or carbs, not half the calories and carbs. And the low-carb trend turned out to be short-lived. (Positioning a product to leverage a fad is a common mistake.)

Why didn’t these issues come up before the launch? Sometimes market research is skewed by asking the wrong questions or rendered useless by failing to look objectively at the results. New products can take on a life of their own within an organization, becoming so hyped that there’s no turning back. Coca-Cola’s management ultimately deemed C2 a failure. Worldwide case volume for all three drinks grew by only 2% in 2004 (and growth in North America was flat), suggesting that C2’s few sales came mostly at the expense of Coke and Diet Coke. The company learned from its mistake, though: A year later it launched Coke Zero, a no-calorie, full-flavor product that can be found on shelves—and in men’s hands—today.


Segway
‘build it and they will come’ has been disproved by Segway. This example shows what happens when the target market is not defined. They haven’t asked themselves who will buy this and at what price? 

The buzz spiralled out of control when news of a secret new product code-named Ginger and created by the renowned inventor Dean Kamen leaked to the press nearly 12 months before the product’s release. Kamen, it was said, was coming up with nothing less than an alternative to the automobile. When investors and the public learned that the invention was actually a technologically advanced motorized scooter, they were dumbfounded. Ads showing riders who looked like circus performers perching on weird-looking chariots didn’t help, nor did the price tag—$5,000. Instead of selling 10,000 machines a week, as Kamen had predicted, the Segway sold about 24,000 in its first five years. Now it sells for far less to police forces, urban tour guides, and warehouse companies, not the general public. If there was ever a product to disprove the axiom “If you build it, they will come,” it’s the Segway. 


Secret Weapon - Superdrug
Example of understanding the target market and using research to influence the design.

“Research had identified the need for a range of toiletries and cosmetics that would actively appeal to 13-18 year old girls, but not their mothers, In particular, it was important to use physical packaging that was totally different to the packs bought by their mothers. Hence the use of blood bags to contain the bath soaks - cool to this age group, but slightly off putting to their mothers” - Bruce Duckworth (page 72 Demographics) They fully understood the target audience not only their demographics but also understood their habits. The age group are in an experimentation period where they are trying to find themselves and define who they are as a person. A result of this is that they change their cosmetics on a regular basis - from the colour of eye shadow to their fragrance. Turner Duckworth made sure to use research to inform each stage of the design process; using qualitative research allowed them to gage the likes and dislikes of competing products currently on the market. Focus groups were used throughout to validate the brand proposition, gain insight into the brands identity and confirm the packaging design. The focus and attention to the target market paid off as the products strongly resonated with the 13-18 year olds as they felt the product was ‘for them’. The product range bought in £3 million in the first year alone; double the initial target sales!

Barbie
Example of updating designs to fit in with the current times.

Barbie is supposed to reflect the times by the clothes she wears, the car she drives and her pursuits. However the packaging hadn’t been updated since the 1970’s which left it looking dated and out of fashion. Parham Santana, New York, redesigned the packaging to bring it up to date making the new packaging modern. The design didn’t call for major changes just alterations to bring it back to life. 

KFC -Japan
Example of understanding different cultural needs and standards and then changing the design to fit accordingly.

Shin Ohkawara, former president and CEO of Kentucky Fried Chicken Japan, had to fight to break from many of KFC’s standard American practices. Ohkawara adapted to the local culture that expects higher standards of quality and presentation even from fried foods. Nation’s Restaurant News reported in 1988 that, instead of dumping chicken into buckets, KFCJ neatly arranges chicken in a single layer, in wide boxes with ribbed, plastic bottoms to minimize grease absorption. This simple packaging change had a huge positive impact on customer perception and sales.
"Compared with the United States, packaging costs us more than twice as much, but we are doing it," explained Ohkawara. Naturally, U.S. management resisted, but Ohkawara prevailed. He insisted on additional quality improvements and made the franchise a success in Japan.
"Kentucky (Fried Chicken) would never have been successful here by following American advice," commented the chief editor of one of Japan’s leading restaurant industry publications.

Jones Soda 
Example of making the brand/products more personal for the consumer.

“Your Photo, Your Soda, Your Brand”
An excellent example of customisation is the Jones Soda brand. Its soul lies in the personalised, capricious imagery used for different flavours. By allowing consumers to submit their own photographs to be used on labels, the packaging design of this brand literally reflects the individuality of its products and its consumers. This fresh design approach breaks apart the consumers’ preconceived notion of a national beverage brand and hits the markin projecting a unique and customised brand personality that’s always about the consumer (page 49 Packaging Design)

makes people feel involved - keeps them interested
excitement of having your picture on a bottle 
loyalty

Colgate
Considering packaging material and considering the receiving target market.

Colgate, for instance, chose to differentiate its products in China by using a packaging material that was scarcely used by competitors when the company entered the Chinese market in 1992. Back then, the majority of domestic toothpaste manufacturers used aluminium tubes. Colgate, instead, adopted the plastic tube that is now commonly used by almost all toothpaste brands as this is more convenient, durable, and safe for the user. The new packaging material helped Colgate seize about one third of the market share over the years.

Help Remedies 
Simplifying the design to the essentials, focusing on customer experience and design rather than whats in the product.

Created by Little Fury, it is an over the counter healthcare products with the aim to make healthcare issues simple. The designs have stripped back the complicated jargon and have used a straightforward and friendly tone of voice to show exactly what the product does by having the problem written out. A range has been created and using different colours for different problems, the designs are clear and work well as a range. This design has simplified the product down to its essentials, people are caring less about how it works but more about how it makes us feel. As an article in the today’s NY Times’ Bits column, written by Nick Bilton points out, we care less and less about the mysterious technology of the things we buy and more about the experience of using objects and yes their design. (https://richardshear.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/the-tail-end-of-technology-and-how-we-choose/) Shift from rational to emotional??


Absolut Unique 
Thinking outside the box to offer a unique one of a kind product quite literally. Evokes a feeling of individualism. 

Absolut Vodka created a range of 4 million bottles each with a unique design. The colourful designs are created randomly by the machines in the decoration process. The machines were altered so instead of producing accurate replicas it produced random bursts of colour. This combined with each bottles personal number it makes the new product exciting, individualistic and one of a kind. Customers can find a bottle with a design that they like or appreciate and can feel happy that they are the only one in the world with that bottle. It makes the consumer feel special to own a limited edition product and brings back a feeling, like with hand made items, of an extra ordinary and exclusive item. “The production used splash guns, 38 colours, 51 pattern types and computerised pattern algorithms to ensure complete randomness.” (http://www.thespiritsbusiness.com/2012/09/absolut-creates-4-million-uniquely-designed-bottles/)
The company estimates that it would take 94 quintillion bottles before two similar ones are created.